Китайское "экономическое чудо": опыт сравнительного психологического анализа : CHINESE ‘ECONOMIC MIRACLE’: EXPERIENCE OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

• Main Author: Сухарев Александр Владимирович
• Format: Report
• Language: unknown
• Published: Пространство и Время 2018
• Subjects: китайское экономическое чудо; коллективный субъект; ментальность элиты; психологическая зрелость; этнофункциональный подход.; Chinese economic miracle; a collective subject; mentality of the elite; psychological maturity; ethno-functional approach; Iceland
• Online Access: https://dx.doi.org/10.24411/2219-4525-2018-11041; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kitayskoe-ekonomicheskoe-chudo-opyt-sravnitelnogo-psihologicheskogo-analiza/pdf

Предпринята попытка научного анализа психологических причин возникновения феномена «китайского экономического чуда». Сравнительный психологический анализ развития ментальности элит русского, западноевропейского и китайского коллективных субъектов с позиций психологической этнофункциональной методологии показал, что уровень психологической зрелости китайского коллективного субъекта является более высоким по сравнению с западноевропейским, а уровень зрелости западноевропейской элиты – более высоким по сравнению с характерным для русской элиты. : Scientific analysis of the psychological causes of ‘Chinese economic miracle’ phenomenon is of great interest since such inquiry was never carried out in the context of ethno-psychological and ethno-cultural characteristics of these developments. The matter of my research is mentality of the elites of Russian, Western European and Chinese collective subjects: I believe that such mental characteristic, as psychological maturity level, is decisive in terms of the ability of a collective subject to make an economic breakthrough. To study this problem I used psychological ethno-functional approach, historical-genetic and comparative methods along with method of ethnofunctional historical and psychological reconstruction. In this article, I present in the most general terms some results of the comparative analysis of the ethno-functional development of such collective subjects, as Chinese, Russian and Western elites. In my previous works, I have shown that the most important indicators of high psychological maturity level are due to self-reflection in early childhood memories of archaic ethno-integrating natural, natural-animistic and on-the-ethnic-religious ideas. Thus, Russian elite was typically characterized by the ousting pre-Christian natural-animistic ideas from the mentality of the collective subject. Following the example of Byzantium, since the 14th century, the ancient Russian state began to pursue politically sins against the faith, which included manifestations of the pagan cult. The mentality development of the Western European elite, as compared with the Russian one, has an incomparably higher level of self-reflection in terms of the representation of pre-Christian natural-animistic and heroic ideas in written sources. In Italy, starting from the late 10th c., especially in the Renaissance, the attitude towards pre-Christian content of the mentality of one’s own ethnic environment became more and more positive. The essential difference between Western European and Russian mentalities was also in the fact that in Europe, starting at least from the 14th century, the natural science component was already sufficiently represented in schools and universities, and starting from the 17th century (from the 10th century in Iceland) schooling was carried out in the native language. Religious and philosophical-ideological components in the mentality of China throughout its history have been distinguished by pluralism. Moreover, Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism either organically included the most ancient Chinese belief in ghosts, or were very loyal to it as a revered tradition. As a result, the level of psychological maturity of the Chinese collective subject is higher than that of Western Europe, which, in turn, is higher than this indicator among the Russian elite. Based on a brief comparative analysis, I conclude that in terms of creativity, socio-moral equilibrium and psychological adaptation possibilities the Chinese collective subject has the supreme politicaleconomic and humanitarian potential.