Media Coverage of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Drilling Controversy ...
Protected areas are often subject to legal changes that allow natural resource extraction to occur within their boundaries. It is important to understand how the media covers these legal changes in order to inform science communication, environmental policy, and practice. As a case study, the oil dr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Journal of Mason Graduate Research
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.13021/g8jmgr.v3i2.575 https://journals.gmu.edu/index.php/jmgr/article/view/575 |
| Summary: | Protected areas are often subject to legal changes that allow natural resource extraction to occur within their boundaries. It is important to understand how the media covers these legal changes in order to inform science communication, environmental policy, and practice. As a case study, the oil drilling controversy in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), the largest protected area in the United States, was examined. ANWR contains both environmental and potential economic value, including billions of barrels of oil. Controversy over whether to drill in the 1002 region of ANWR has been ongoing since the late 1970s and has been covered extensively in the media. A content analysis of media coverage of US national and Alaskan local newspapers was conducted for 100 news articles. Contrary to expectations, it was found that on average, media coverage tended to focus more on reasons to oppose drilling. When comparing local and national sources, it was found that local news articles also focused more on ... : Journal of Mason Graduate Research, Vol 3 No 2 (2016): Addressing Complex Global Issues ... |
|---|