Phytoplankton Growth and Light-Absorption as Regulated by Light, Temperature, and Nutrients

• Published in: Polar Research
• Main Authors: KIEFER, DA, CULLEN, JJ
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2013
• Subjects: Polar Research
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-8369.1991.tb00642.x; http://hdl.handle.net/10222/26431

Numerous studies of the growth of phytoplankton in the laboratory have demonstrated the dependence of cellular pigment concentration and growth rate upon light intensity, photoperiod, temperature, and nutrient supply. These same environmental parameters vary with season in thc polar seas and presumably affect the growth rate and cellular pigment concentration of the phytoplankton crop. Unfortunately, there has not been a complete mathematical description of the interaction of ali four environmental parameters. This study presents an approach to describing these interactions. It can reasonably be assumed that the gross specific growth rate, g, is a function of the specific rate of light absorption: g = PI-GAMMA (1-exp(-a(p) phi(max) E0/PI-theta)). The dependent variables in this equation are g, the gross specific growth rate, PI, the maximum carbon-specific photosynthetic rate, and, theta, the ratio of carbon to chlorophyll. The value of all three dependent variables is constrained. The independent variables are E0, the light intensity (assumed constant during the photoperiod), and GAMMA, the photoperiod (as a fraction of 24 hours) that the cells are illuminated. n is the instantaneous capacity of thc dark reactions to assimilate electrons, while thc product a(p) phi(max) E0/theta is the instantaneous capacity of the light reactions to supply electrons. If the capacity for photochemistry exceeds the capacity for assimilation, dissipative processes occur, and the quantum yield is low. We have applied this equation to thc analysis of the growth and light absorption by Skeletonema costatum cultured under light, temperature, and nutrient limitation. Decreases in nutrient supply and temperature pause decreases in PI and increases in theta; thus both thc capacity for electron supply and utilisation decrease. However, decreases in temperature decrease the capacity for electron assimilation more rapidly than thc capacity for supply; quantum yield drops. Decreases in nutrient supply cause the capacity for supply and assimilation to drop in parallel; quantum yeield is maintained. Decreases in day length cause decreases in theta and increases in PI. Thc capacity to assimilate electrons and the capacity to supply electrons increase in parallel; quantum yield is maintained. Decreases in light intensity cause decreases in both theta and the capacity to supply electrons. Although the changes in PI with light intensity are difficult to assess, the capacity to assimilate electrons appears to ec little changed by light limitation. Quantum yields increase with decreasing light levels.