Modern understanding of "geoeconomic position" and the Saint-Petersburg agglomeration
This article presents a modern interpretation of the concept of ‘geoeconomic position' as applied to one of the most important centres of the Baltic region — the St. Petersburg agglomeration. The coastal location of the agglomeration and close connections with the Leningrad region make it possi...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Балтийский федеральный университет им. Иммануила Канта»
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modern-understanding-of-geoeconomic-position-and-the-saint-petersburg-agglomeration http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/16868545.png |
| Summary: | This article presents a modern interpretation of the concept of ‘geoeconomic position' as applied to one of the most important centres of the Baltic region — the St. Petersburg agglomeration. The coastal location of the agglomeration and close connections with the Leningrad region make it possible to consider the Saint Petersburg coastal region (Baltic Area) as a whole. The article sets out not only to verify, confirm, and explain the features of the geoeconomic position of the coastal region, but also to describe the contiguous geoeconomic space. The position of the St. Petersburg coastal region is of crucial importance for ensuring a steady growth of regional economy, the propagation of industrialization impulses, and modernization in the heart of Russian North-western macroregion. At the same time, the specific features of the region's geoeconomic position magnify the ‘inherited' ad acquired effects of focal industrialization and space polarization, which creates additional prerequisites for the inversion of the Russian economic space — ‘Russia of the physical space' and ‘the economic space of Russia'. The study uses traditional methodology of economic geography (the territorial, cluster, and spatial approaches) and the geoeconomic approach developed by the authors. The article also addresses recent findings in regional economy and spatial studies. It is aimed at the development of the geoeconomic paradigm in the framework of social geography and that of spatial science. An analysis of the geoeconomic position and the developing spatial relations can be of interest for researchers of geographic clusters, agglomerations, and such cross-border forms of cooperation, as growth triangles, for example. |
|---|