Troctolite 76535: A sample of the Moon's South Pole-Aitken basin?

© 2019 Elsevier Inc. Lunar samples returned by the Apollo program have provided insights into numerous solar system processes. However, no samples were returned from the lunar farside, where one of the Moon's most geologically important features resides: the 2500-km-diameter South Pole-Aitken b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Icarus
Main Authors: Garrick-Bethell, I., Miljkovic, Katarina, Hiesinger, H., van der Bogert, C.H., Laneuville, M., Shuster, D.L., Korycansky, D.G.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE 2020
Subjects:
Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Astronomy & Astrophysics
INNER SOLAR-SYSTEM
LUNAR CATACLYSM
MG-SUITE
SHOCK COMPRESSION
MANTLE XENOLITHS
OBLIQUE IMPACTS
ORIGIN
BOMBARDMENT
HISTORY
CHRONOLOGY
Aitken
South Pole
South pole
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/90200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113430
Description
Summary:© 2019 Elsevier Inc. Lunar samples returned by the Apollo program have provided insights into numerous solar system processes. However, no samples were returned from the lunar farside, where one of the Moon's most geologically important features resides: the 2500-km-diameter South Pole-Aitken basin (SPA). Here, we explore the hypothesis that lunar troctolite 76535 was excavated by SPA. This hypothesis is motivated by the sample's low peak shock pressure (<6 GPa), its substantial depth of origin (45–65 km), and its ancient 40Ar/39Ar age of 4.25 Ga. We use hydrodynamic simulations of crater formation to show that for vertically incident impactors, SPA is the only known basin that can excavate material from the depth and shock pressure range relevant to 76535. The thermal history of 76535 also rules out excavation where a magma ocean was locally present. However, for the vertical impacts modeled, delivery of 76535 to the Apollo 17 site, where it was collected, requires a second impact event that preserved the sample's low shock state. An alternative interpretation of the SPA origin is that 76535 originates from the Serenitatis, Fecunditatis, or Australe basins, if the inferred origin depth of 76535 is in error by ~20 km, or its inferred peak shock pressure is in error by a factor of ~2. These basins could also be candidates for excavating 76535, if oblique impacts yield lower shock pressures of material excavated from the relevant depth. If troctolite 76535 is in fact a sample of SPA, we find that its 4.25 Ga excavation age and the density of large (100–300 km diameter) impact basins within and on the rim of SPA are consistent with the monotonically decaying Neukum (1983) chronology.

Similar Items