Pole-to-pole biogeography of surface and deep marine bacterial communities

6 pages, 4 figures The Antarctic and Arctic regions offer a unique opportunity to test factors shaping biogeography of marine microbial communities because these regions are geographically far apart, yet share similar selection pressures. Here, we report a comprehensive comparison of bacterioplankto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Main Authors: Ghiglione, J. F., Galand, Pierre E., Pommier, Thomas, Pedrós-Alió, Carlos, Maas, Elizabeth W., Bakker, Kevin, Bertilsson, Stefan, Kirchman, David L., Lovejoy, Connie, Yager, Patricia L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/72088
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208160109
Description
Summary:6 pages, 4 figures The Antarctic and Arctic regions offer a unique opportunity to test factors shaping biogeography of marine microbial communities because these regions are geographically far apart, yet share similar selection pressures. Here, we report a comprehensive comparison of bacterioplankton diversity between polar oceans, using standardized methods for pyrosequencing the V6 region of the small subunit ribosomal (SSU) rRNA gene. Bacterial communities from lower latitude oceans were included, providing a global perspective. A clear difference between Southern and Arctic Ocean surface communities was evident, with 78% of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) unique to the Southern Ocean and 70% unique to the Arctic Ocean. Although polar ocean bacterial communities were more similar to each other than to lower latitude pelagic communities, analyses of depths, seasons, and coastal vs. open waters, the Southern and Arctic Ocean bacterioplankton communities consistently clustered separately from each other. Coastal surface Southern and Arctic Ocean communities were more dissimilar from their respective open ocean communities. In contrast, deep ocean communities differed less between poles and lower latitude deep waters and displayed different diversity patterns compared with the surface. In addition, estimated diversity (Chao1) for surface and deep communities did not correlate significantly with latitude or temperature. Our results suggest differences in environmental conditions at the poles and different selection mechanisms controlling surface and deep ocean community structure and diversity. Surface bacterioplankton may be subjected to more short-term, variable conditions, whereas deep communities appear to be structured by longer water-mass residence time and connectivity through ocean circulation We thank the members of field teams, shipboard crews, and logistics support personnel from all national polar programs involved in sample collection, without whom this study would not have been possible. The ...