Calibrating ecosystem models to support ecosystem-based management of marine systems
16 pages, 9 figures, 1 table, supplementary data https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad213.-- Data availability: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author Ecosystem models, such as Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE), provide a platform to simulate intrica...
Published in: | ICES Journal of Marine Science |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/356742 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad213 |
Summary: | 16 pages, 9 figures, 1 table, supplementary data https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad213.-- Data availability: The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author Ecosystem models, such as Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE), provide a platform to simulate intricate policy scenarios where multiple species, pressures, and ecosystem services interact. Complex questions often return complex answers, necessitating evidence and advice to be communicated in terms of trade-offs, risks, and uncertainty. Calibration procedures for EwE, which can act as a source of uncertainty and bias in model results, have yet to be explored in a comprehensive way that communicates how sensitive model outputs are to different calibration approaches. As the EwE community has grown, multiple divergent approaches have been applied to calibrate models through the estimation of vulnerability multipliers: parameters that augment the consumption rate limits of predators. Here we explore the underlying principles of vulnerability multipliers as well as existing calibration approaches and their justification. Two case studies are presented: the first explores how vulnerability multipliers emerge based on the chosen calibration approach using simulated data, while the second takes two operational EwE models (Irish Sea and Northwest Atlantic Continental Shelf) and compares their outputs when calibrated following alternate calibration approaches. We show how calibration approaches can impact model-derived advice and provide a list of best practice recommendations for EwE calibration J.B. would like to acknowledge the EU Horizon project OceanICU (grant agreement no. 101083922). J.J.H. and V.C. would like to acknowledge the EU Horizon 2020 project EcoScope: ecocentric management for sustainable fisheries and healthy marine ecosystems project (grant agreement no. 101000302). M.C. would like to acknowledge EU Horizon project Ges4Seas (grant agreement no. 101059877), the Spanish project ProOceans (Plan Estatal de ... |
---|