Cross-sensory interference assessment after exposure to noise shows different effects in the blue crab olfactory and sound sensing capabilities

• Published in: Science of The Total Environment
• Main Authors: Solé, Marta, De Vreese, Steffen, Sánchez, Antonio M., Fortuño Alós, José Manuel, Van der Schaar, Mike, Sancho, Núria, André, Michel
• Other Authors: Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2023
• Subjects: Anthropogenic noise; Callinectes sapidus; Aquatic plus (+) maze; Foraging behaviour; Statocyst; Righting reflex; Conserve and sustainably use the oceans; seas and marine resources for sustainable development; Sciaenops ocellatus
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/311710; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162260

13 pages, 10 figures, supplementary material https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162260.-- Data availability: Data will be made available on request Underwater noise pollution is an increasing threat to marine ecosystems. Marine animals use sound in communication and orientation processes. The introduction of anthropogenic noise in their habitat can interfere with sound production and reception as well as with the acquisition of vital information through other sensory systems. In the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), the statocyst is responsible for acoustic perception, and it is housed at the base of its first pair of antennae (antennule). The sensilla of the distal part of these antennule hosts the olfactory system, which is key for foraging. Given the anatomical proximity of the two sensory regions, we evaluated the possible interference of sound exposure with the crab ability to find food, by using an aquatic maze, and looked at the potential impairment of the righting reflex as well as at ultrastructural damages in statocysts. Although a significant effect was observed when looking at the time used by the animal to recover its habitual position (“righting reflex”), which was associated to lesions in the statocyst sensory epithelia, the time required to find food did not increase after the exposure to sound. When the crabs were exposed to natural sounds (marine background noise and sounds of their predators: Micropogonias undulates and Sciaenops ocellatus) they did not show significant differences in foraging behaviour. Although we found no unequivocal evidence of a negative impact of sound on olfactory capabilities, the study showed a clear righting reflex impairment correlated with ultrastructural damages of the statocysts. We argue that crab populations that cannot easily avoid noise sources due to their specific coastal distributions may incur in significant direct fitness costs (e.g. impairment of complex reflexes). This integrated approach to sound effect assessment could be used as a model for ...