Contrasting wolf responses to different paved roads and traffic volume levels

In some regions of the world, large carnivores, such as wolves, persist in landscapes with dense networks of paved roads. However, beyond the general impacts of roads on wildlife, we still lack information on carnivore responses to different types of roads and traffic volume levels. Using wolves in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biodiversity and Conservation
Main Authors: Dennehy, Emma, Llaneza, Luis, López-Bao, José V.
Other Authors: Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España), Xunta de Galicia
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Springer 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/267537
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02239-y
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100010801
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003329
Description
Summary:In some regions of the world, large carnivores, such as wolves, persist in landscapes with dense networks of paved roads. However, beyond the general impacts of roads on wildlife, we still lack information on carnivore responses to different types of roads and traffic volume levels. Using wolves in NW Spain as a case study, we show how wolves respond differently to paved road classes depending on road size, speed limit and traffic volume. All wolves evaluated (25 GPS collared wolves) crossed paved roads. Overall, during 3,915 sampling days, we recorded 29,859 wolf crossings. Wolf crossings of all paved road classes were recorded at a mean rate of 0.022 crossings/day/km (95% CI 0.016–0.027). Wolves crossed low speed and low traffic volume roads more frequently, and more often during the night, in order to lessen the chances of encountering traffic. We found mortality to be highest on roads with high speed and high traffic volume. How wolves interact with paved roads should be considered in landscape planning strategies in order to guarantee wolf long-term persistence in human-dominated landscapes. In our case, our results support an increasing focus on primary roads (class II) to identify segments of these roads where road mitigation efforts should be prioritised. Our study also highlights the importance of considering paved road classes when studying the impact of roads on wildlife. JVLB was supported by a Ramon & Cajal research contract (RYC-2015-18932) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitivenes. We are in debt to the staff of the Regional Government of Galicia. We thank Victor Sazatornil, Emilio J. García and Vicente Palacios for wolf collaring and field assistance. Spatial information from some wolves in the study area comes from research projects funded by DESA S.L. and GAMESA S.L. This is scientific paper no. from the Iberian Wolf Research Team (IWRT).