Comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus

5 pages, 9 figures. Comments on diagnostic procedures and their pitfalls, which were experienced mainly during the research of AGD in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus, are presented. Diagnostically important data are summarised and the necessity of morphological recognition of the agent is highlighted....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dyková, Iva, Novoa, Beatriz
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: European Association of Fish Pathologists 2001
Subjects:
Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25362
id ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/25362
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcsic:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/25362 2024-02-11T10:08:25+01:00 Comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus Dyková, Iva Novoa, Beatriz 2001 205051 bytes application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25362 en eng European Association of Fish Pathologists http://eafp.org/bulletin-archive/2001-volume-21/issue-1/ Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 21(1): 40-44 (2001) 0108-0288 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25362 open artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 2001 ftcsic 2024-01-16T09:27:18Z 5 pages, 9 figures. Comments on diagnostic procedures and their pitfalls, which were experienced mainly during the research of AGD in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus, are presented. Diagnostically important data are summarised and the necessity of morphological recognition of the agent is highlighted. This research was funded by the Grant agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (Project No. A6022802) and by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Project No. 206/00/0265). Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Scophthalmus maximus Turbot Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
institution Open Polar
collection Digital.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)
op_collection_id ftcsic
language English
description 5 pages, 9 figures. Comments on diagnostic procedures and their pitfalls, which were experienced mainly during the research of AGD in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus, are presented. Diagnostically important data are summarised and the necessity of morphological recognition of the agent is highlighted. This research was funded by the Grant agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (Project No. A6022802) and by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Project No. 206/00/0265). Peer reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Dyková, Iva
Novoa, Beatriz
spellingShingle Dyková, Iva
Novoa, Beatriz
Comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus
author_facet Dyková, Iva
Novoa, Beatriz
author_sort Dyková, Iva
title Comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus
title_short Comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus
title_full Comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus
title_fullStr Comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus
title_full_unstemmed Comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus
title_sort comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (agd) in turbot, scophthalmus maximus
publisher European Association of Fish Pathologists
publishDate 2001
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25362
genre Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
genre_facet Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
op_relation http://eafp.org/bulletin-archive/2001-volume-21/issue-1/
Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 21(1): 40-44 (2001)
0108-0288
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25362
op_rights open
_version_ 1790607732740456448

Similar Items