Comments on diagnosis of amoebic gill disease (AGD) in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus
5 pages, 9 figures. Comments on diagnostic procedures and their pitfalls, which were experienced mainly during the research of AGD in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus, are presented. Diagnostically important data are summarised and the necessity of morphological recognition of the agent is highlighted....
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Association of Fish Pathologists
2001
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/25362 |
| Summary: | 5 pages, 9 figures. Comments on diagnostic procedures and their pitfalls, which were experienced mainly during the research of AGD in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus, are presented. Diagnostically important data are summarised and the necessity of morphological recognition of the agent is highlighted. This research was funded by the Grant agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (Project No. A6022802) and by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Project No. 206/00/0265). Peer reviewed |
|---|