Controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current

• Published in: Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography
• Main Authors: Hoppe, C. J. M., Santos-Echeandía, Juan, Trimborn, Scarlett
• Other Authors: European Commission
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2017
• Subjects: Biological pump; Nutrient budgets; Primary productivity; Southern Ocean; Antarctic; The Antarctic; Antarc*
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/148878; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.10.005; https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000780

11 páginas, 6 figuras, 2 tablas.-- C.J.M. Hoppe . et al.-- Proyecto Carbochange.-- This is an open access article under the CCBY-NC-ND license The Antarctic Circumpolar Current has a high potential for primary production and carbon sequestration through the biological pump. In the current study, two large-scale blooms observed in 2012 during a cruise with R.V. Polarstern were investigated with respect to phytoplankton standing stocks, primary productivity and nutrient budgets. While net primary productivity was similar in both blooms, chlorophyll a –specific photosynthesis was more efficient in the bloom closer to the island of South Georgia (39 °W, 50 °S) compared to the open ocean bloom further east (12 °W, 51 °S). We did not find evidence for light being the driver of bloom dynamics as chlorophyll standing stocks up to 165 mg m−2 developed despite mixed layers as deep as 90 m. Since the two bloom regions differ in their distance to shelf areas, potential sources of iron vary. Nutrient (nitrate, phosphate, silicate) deficits were similar in both areas despite different bloom ages, but their ratios indicated more pronounced iron limitation at 12 °W compared to 39 °W. While primarily the supply of iron and not the availability of light seemed to control onset and duration of the blooms, higher grazing pressure could have exerted a stronger control toward the declining phase of the blooms C.J.M.H. and B.R. were funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Community׳s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), ERC Grant agreement no. 205150. S.T. was funded by the German Science Foundation (DFG), project TR 899/2 and the Helmholtz Impulse Fond (HGF Young Investigator Group EcoTrace). Funding to M.S. was supplied by CAPES, Brazil (Grant BEX 3483/09-6), and to A.B. by the Helmholtz Innovation Fund Phytooptics. This work was funded by the MINECO of Spain (Grant CGL2010-11846-E) and the Government of the Balearic Islands (Grant AAEE083/09). J.S.E. was supported by the JAE-Doc program of the ...