Estimating the population size of the endangered Cantabrian brown bear through genetic sampling
Th e Cantabrian brown bear Ursus arctos population can be seen as a paradigm in conservation biology due to its endangerment status and genetic uniqueness. Th erefore, the need to obtain basic demographic data to inform management actions for conservation is imperative. Despite this, empirical data...
| Published in: | Wildlife Biology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nordic Ecological Society Oikos
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/104394 https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00069 |
| Summary: | Th e Cantabrian brown bear Ursus arctos population can be seen as a paradigm in conservation biology due to its endangerment status and genetic uniqueness. Th erefore, the need to obtain basic demographic data to inform management actions for conservation is imperative. Despite this, empirical data on the size and trends of the Cantabrian bear population are scarce. Here we present the fi rst estimates of population size (N c ) and eff ective population size (N e ) of the whole Cantabrian brown bear population. We genotyped 270 non-invasive samples collected during 2006 throughout the entire range of the population and subsequently identifi ed 130 individuals. Diff erent model estimators of N c based on capture – mark – recapture (CMR) procedures were compared. Th e average for the best three models (Mh Chao, Mh Darroch and CAPWIRE TIRM) yielded a total estimate of N c 223 individuals (CI 95% 183 – 278) and N e 50 (CI 95% 36 – 75) providing an N e / N c ratio of 0.22. Estimates for the two subpopulations commonly recognized in the Cantabrian range were N c 203 (CI 95% 168 – 260) and N e 47 (CI 95% 36 – 70) for the western subpopulation and N c 19 (CI 95% 12 – 40) and N e 9 (CI 95% 8 – 12) for the eastern subpopulation. Th ese data suggest that the Cantabrian brown bear population has increased recently, mainly in the western subpopulation, after a long period of decline and isolation which lead to the split of the population at the beginning of the 20th century. Population sizes in the early 1990s were thought to be only 60 individuals for the western subpopulation and 14 individuals in the eastern one. Th e eff orts to improve conservation policies made since then have probably contributed, to some extent, to the population increase during the last couple of decades. Peer reviewed |
|---|