Cloud- and ice-albedo feedbacks drive greater Greenland ice sheet sensitivity to warming in CMIP6 than in CMIP5
The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has been losing mass since the 1990s as a direct consequence of rising temperatures and has been projected to continue to lose mass at an accelerating pace throughout the 21 st century, making it one of the largest contributors to future sea-level rise. The latest Clim...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-24 https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2023-24/ |
| Summary: | The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has been losing mass since the 1990s as a direct consequence of rising temperatures and has been projected to continue to lose mass at an accelerating pace throughout the 21 st century, making it one of the largest contributors to future sea-level rise. The latest Climate Model Intercomparison Project 6th phase (CMIP6) models produce a greater Arctic amplification signal and therefore also a notably larger mass loss from the GrIS when compared to the older CMIP5 projections, despite similar forcing levels from greenhouse gas emissions. However, it is also argued that the strength of regional factors such as melt-albedo feedbacks and cloud-related feedbacks will partly impact future melt and sea-level rise contribution, but little is yet known about the role of these regional factors in differences in GrIS surface melt projections between CMIP6 to CMIP5. In this study, we use high-resolution (15 km) regional climate model simulations over the GrIS performed using the Modéle Atmosphériqe Régional (MAR) to physically downscale six CMIP5 RCP8.5 and five CMIP6 SSP5-8.5 extreme high-emission scenario simulations. Here, we show a greater annual mass loss from the GrIS at the end of the 21 st century, but also for a given temperature increase over the GrIS, when comparing CMIP6 to CMIP5. We find a greater sensitivity of Greenland surface mass loss in CMIP6 centred around summer and autumn, yet the difference in mass loss is largest during autumn with a reduction of 14.1 ± 4.8 mmWE for a regional warming of +6.7 °C, 12.5 mmWE more mass loss than in CMIP5 RCP8.5 simulations for the same warming. Assessment of the surface energy budget and cloud-related feedbacks suggests a reduction in high clouds during summer and autumn – in addition to enhanced cloud optical depth during autumn – to be the main drivers of the additional energy reaching the surface, subsequently leading to enhanced surface melt and mass loss in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5. Our analysis highlights that Greenland is losing more ... |
|---|