Towards the construction of regional marine radiocarbon calibration curves: an unsupervised machine learning approach
Radiocarbon may serve as a powerful dating tool in palaeoceanography, but its accuracy is severely limited by the need to calibrate radiocarbon dates to calendar ages. A key problem is that marine radiocarbon dates must be corrected for past offsets from either the contemporary atmosphere (i.e. ‘res...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2023-26 https://gchron.copernicus.org/preprints/gchron-2023-26/ |
| Summary: | Radiocarbon may serve as a powerful dating tool in palaeoceanography, but its accuracy is severely limited by the need to calibrate radiocarbon dates to calendar ages. A key problem is that marine radiocarbon dates must be corrected for past offsets from either the contemporary atmosphere (i.e. ‘reservoir age’ offsets) or a modelled estimate of the global average surface ocean (i.e. delta-R offsets). This presents a challenge because the spatial distribution of reservoir ages and delta-R offsets can vary significantly, particularly over periods of major marine hydrographic and/or carbon cycle change such as the last deglaciation. Modern reservoir age/delta-R estimates therefore have limited applicability. The construction of regional marine calibration curves could provide a solution to this challenge. However, the spatial reach of such calibrations, and their robustness subject to temporal changes in climate and ocean circulation would need to be tested. Here, we use unsupervised machine learning techniques to define distinct regions of the surface ocean that exhibit coherent behaviour in terms of their radiocarbon age offsets from the contemporary atmosphere (R-ages). We investigate the performance of multiple algorithms (K-Means, K-Medoids, hierarchical clustering) applied to outputs from 2 different numerical models, spanning a range of climate states and timescales of adjustment. Comparisons between the cluster assignments across model runs confirm some robust regional patterns that likely stem from constraints imposed by large-scale ocean and atmospheric physics (i.e. locations of deep mixing, gyres, fronts, divergence etc.). At the coarsest scale, regions of coherent R-age variability correspond to the major ocean basins (Arctic, Atlantic, Southern, Indo-Pacific). By further dividing basin-scale shape-based clusters into amplitude-based subclusters, we recover regional associations that cohere with known modern oceanographic processes, such as increased high latitude R-ages, or the propagation of R-age ... |
|---|