Glacial history of Inglefield Land, north Greenland from combined in-situ 10Be and 14C exposure dating

• Main Authors: Søndergaard, Anne Sofie, Larsen, Nicolaj Krog, Steinemann, Olivia, Olsen, Jesper, Funder, Svend, Egholm, David Lundbek, Kjær, Kurt Henrik
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: 2020
• Subjects: Greenland; Inglefield Land; Nares; glacier; Humboldt Glacier; Ice Sheet; Inglefield land; Nares strait; North Greenland
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2020-66; https://cp.copernicus.org/preprints/cp-2020-66/

Exposing the sensitivity of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) to Holocene climate changes is a key prerequisite for understanding the future response of the ice sheet to global warming. In this study, we present new information on the Holocene glacial history of the GrIS in Inglefield Land, north Greenland. We use 10 Be and in-situ 14 C exposure dating to constrain the timing of deglaciation in the area and radiocarbon dating of reworked molluscs and wood fragments to constrain when the ice sheet retreated behind its present-day extent. The 10 Be ages are scattered ranging from c. 92.7 to 6.8 ka whereas the in-situ 14 C ages range from c. 14.2 to 6.7 ka. Almost half of the apparent 10 Be ages predate the Last Glacial Maximum and up to 89 % are to some degree affected by nuclide inheritance. Based on the few reliable 10 Be ages, the in-situ 14 C ages and existing radiocarbon ages from Inglefield Land, we find that the deglaciation along the coast commenced c. 8.6–8.3 cal. ka BP in the western part and c. 7.9 ka in the central part, following the opening of Nares Strait and arrival of warm waters. The ice margin reached its present-day position c. 8.2 ka at the Humboldt Glacier and c. 6.7 ka in the central part of Inglefield Land. Radiocarbon ages of reworked molluscs and wood fragments show that the ice margin was behind its present-day extent from c. 5.8 to 0.5 cal. ka BP. After 0.5 cal. ka BP, the ice advanced towards its Little Ice Age position. Our results emphasize that the slowly eroding and possibly cold-based ice in north Greenland makes it difficult to constrain the deglaciation history based on 10 Be ages alone unless it is paired with in-situ 14 C ages. Further, combining our findings with those of recently published studies reveals distinct differences between deglaciation patterns of northwest and north Greenland. Deglaciation of the land areas in northwest Greenland occurred earlier than in north Greenland and periods of restricted ice extent were longer, spanning middle and late Holocene. Overall, this highlights past ice sheet sensitivity towards Holocene climate changes in an area where little information was available just a few years ago.