Auroral ionospheric conductivities: a comparison between experiment and modeling, and theoretical f10.7-dependent model for EISCAT and ESR

Several authors have published models of auroral conductances in the past. Some of them are based on theoretical approaches; others are the result of observations. The data bases for the latter models range from 8 h to 3 years of experiments. In this paper, we show the results of our own modeling, b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annales Geophysicae
Main Authors: Lilensten, J., Blelly, P. L., Kofman, W., Alcaydé, D.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-1297-7
https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/14/1297/1996/
Description
Summary:Several authors have published models of auroral conductances in the past. Some of them are based on theoretical approaches; others are the result of observations. The data bases for the latter models range from 8 h to 3 years of experiments. In this paper, we show the results of our own modeling, based on a coupled ki- netic/fluid approach. We compare these results to the sta- tistical model based on 3 years of experiment. We then model the auroral ionospheric conductances above EISCAT and the EISCAT-Svalbard Radar for different solar-activity indices. These modeled conductances are fitted with a simple law depending on the f 10.7 index and on the solar zenith angle.