Regional validation of the solar irradiance tool SolaRes in clear-sky conditions, with a focus on the aerosol module

• Main Authors: Elias, Thierry, Ferlay, Nicolas, Chesnoiu, Gabriel, Chiapello, Isabelle, Moulana, Mustapha
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: 2024
• Subjects: Aerosol Robotic Network
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-236; https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2023-236/

The objective of the paper is to validate SolaRes (Solar Resource estimate) in clear-sky conditions, and to examine the aerosol influence on the differences between observation and estimate. SolaRes has the ambition to fulfil both research and industrial applications exploiting downwelling solar radiation at surface level. Consistently with solar resource applications, we show the capacity of SolaRes to reproduce the angular behaviour of the angular field, by validating not only global horizontal irradiance (GHI), but also direct normal irradiance (DNI), diffuse horizontal irradiance (DifHI), global and diffuse irradiance in tilted plane (GTI, DifTI), and even the circumsolar contributions. Computations are made with the SMART-G radiative transfer code, taking spectral aerosol optical thickness (AOT) data sets as input, which are delivered by the Aerosol Robotic network (AERONET) and the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS). A mixture of two aerosol models is required to compute aerosol optical properties. Measurements for validation are made at two sites in Northern France. Clear-sky is identified by two methods to show its influence: 1) a method reproducing the AOT variability conditions, and 2) a stricter method eliminating some residual cloud influence but also conditions with largest AOT . SolaRes is validated according to comparison scores found in the literature, with the (relative) root mean square difference (RMSD) in GHI as low as 1 %, and the mean bias difference (MBD) which could be 0 %. Angular behaviour is reproduced with satisfying scores. The circumsolar contribution improves MBD in DNI and DifHI , by 1 % and 4 % respectively, as well as RMSD by ~0.5 %. MBD in DNI is around -1 % and RMSD around 2 %, and MBD in DifHI is 2 % and RMSD around 9 %. RMSD and MBD in both DNI and DifHI are larger than in GHI because they are more sensitive to the aerosol and surface properties. DifTI measured in a vertical plane facing South is reproduced with a RMSD of 8 %, similar to DifHI . It is suggested ...