The myth of the poor fisher:Evidence from the Nordic countries

Fishers are often perceived to be poor, and low income levels are used to justify subsidies and other types of direct and indirect income support to maintain coastal communities. In this study fishers’ income levels are investigated in four Nordic countries; Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden for d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Policy
Main Authors: Nielsen, Max, Asche, Frank, Bergesen, Ole, Blomquist, Johan, Henriksen, Edgar, Hoff, Ayoe, Nielsen, Rasmus, Viðarsson, Jónas R., Waldo, Staffan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://curis.ku.dk/portal/da/publications/the-myth-of-the-poor-fisher(ef3f40e3-71fc-4026-9687-b1a1a1427a6e).html
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.003
Description
Summary:Fishers are often perceived to be poor, and low income levels are used to justify subsidies and other types of direct and indirect income support to maintain coastal communities. In this study fishers’ income levels are investigated in four Nordic countries; Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden for different types of fishers and vessels and in comparison to alternative occupations. The most important result is that fishers in these countries are doing relatively well, and only in Sweden is the fishers’ average income level below the average national income. Within the fleets, there are substantial differences. Owners of coastal vessels tend to have the lowest income, and also lower than crews. Owners as well as crews on larger vessels tend to do much better and in the largest fishing nations, Iceland and Norway, they do especially well. Fishers are often perceived to be poor, and low income levels are used to justify subsidies and other types of direct and indirect income support to maintain coastal communities. In this study fishers’ income levels are investigated in four Nordic countries; Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden for different types of fishers and vessels and in comparison to alternative occupations. The most important result is that fishers in these countries are doing relatively well, and only in Sweden is the fishers’ average income level below the average national income. Within the fleets, there are substantial differences. Owners of coastal vessels tend to have the lowest income, and also lower than crews. Owners as well as crews on larger vessels tend to do much better and in the largest fishing nations, Iceland and Norway, they do especially well.