Reassessing seasonal sea ice predictability of the Pacific-Arctic sector using a Markov model: supplemental data

In this study, a regional linear Markov model is developed to assess seasonal sea ice predictability in the Pacific-Arctic sector. Unlike an earlier pan-Arctic Markov model that was developed with one set of variables for all seasons, the regional model consists of four seasonal modules with differe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yuan, Xiaojun
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7916/4kpg-6904
Description
Summary:In this study, a regional linear Markov model is developed to assess seasonal sea ice predictability in the Pacific-Arctic sector. Unlike an earlier pan-Arctic Markov model that was developed with one set of variables for all seasons, the regional model consists of four seasonal modules with different sets of predictor variables, accommodating seasonally-varying driving processes. A series of sensitivity tests are performed to evaluate the predictive skill in cross-validated experiments and to determine the best model configuration for each season. The prediction skill, as measured by the SIC anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) between predictions and observations, increased by 32% in the Bering Sea and 18% in the Sea of Okhotsk relative to the pan-Arctic model. The regional Markov model's skill is also superior to the skill of anomaly persistence forecasts. Sea ice concentration (SIC) trends significantly contribute to the model skill. However, the model retains skill for detrended sea ice extent predictions up to 7 month lead times in the Bering Sea and the Sea of Okhotsk. We find that subsurface ocean heat content (OHC) provides a crucial source of prediction skill in all seasons, especially in the ice-growing season, and adding sea ice thickness (SIT) to the regional Markov model has a negative contribution to the prediction skill in the cold season but substantial contribution in the warm season. The regional model can also capture the seasonal reemergence of predictability, which is missing in the pan-Arctic model.