C2.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR NORTHERN SHRIMP

concluded that the northern shrimp stock assessment models presented to them were not acceptable to serve as a basis for fishery management advice. Specifically, the SARC58 concluded that shrimp assessment Terms of Reference #2, #3, #4, and #5 were not met. These particular sections are included in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica Carloni, New Hampshire Fish, Game Department
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
northern shrimp
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.638.9510
http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/crd/crd1404/textc.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.638.9510
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.638.9510 2023-05-15T17:43:54+02:00 C2.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR NORTHERN SHRIMP Jessica Carloni New Hampshire Fish Game Department The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.638.9510 http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/crd/crd1404/textc.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.638.9510 http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/crd/crd1404/textc.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/crd/crd1404/textc.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T15:50:05Z concluded that the northern shrimp stock assessment models presented to them were not acceptable to serve as a basis for fishery management advice. Specifically, the SARC58 concluded that shrimp assessment Terms of Reference #2, #3, #4, and #5 were not met. These particular sections are included in this report to document the analyses that were done for the peer review, but they are not recommended by SARC58 as a basis for management.] Text northern shrimp Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description concluded that the northern shrimp stock assessment models presented to them were not acceptable to serve as a basis for fishery management advice. Specifically, the SARC58 concluded that shrimp assessment Terms of Reference #2, #3, #4, and #5 were not met. These particular sections are included in this report to document the analyses that were done for the peer review, but they are not recommended by SARC58 as a basis for management.]
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Jessica Carloni
New Hampshire Fish
Game Department
spellingShingle Jessica Carloni
New Hampshire Fish
Game Department
C2.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR NORTHERN SHRIMP
author_facet Jessica Carloni
New Hampshire Fish
Game Department
author_sort Jessica Carloni
title C2.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR NORTHERN SHRIMP
title_short C2.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR NORTHERN SHRIMP
title_full C2.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR NORTHERN SHRIMP
title_fullStr C2.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR NORTHERN SHRIMP
title_full_unstemmed C2.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR NORTHERN SHRIMP
title_sort c2.0 terms of reference (tor) for northern shrimp
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.638.9510
http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/crd/crd1404/textc.pdf
genre northern shrimp
genre_facet northern shrimp
op_source http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/crd/crd1404/textc.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.638.9510
http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/crd/crd1404/textc.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766146068531118080

Similar Items