C2.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR NORTHERN SHRIMP
concluded that the northern shrimp stock assessment models presented to them were not acceptable to serve as a basis for fishery management advice. Specifically, the SARC58 concluded that shrimp assessment Terms of Reference #2, #3, #4, and #5 were not met. These particular sections are included in...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.638.9510 http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/crd/crd1404/textc.pdf |
| Summary: | concluded that the northern shrimp stock assessment models presented to them were not acceptable to serve as a basis for fishery management advice. Specifically, the SARC58 concluded that shrimp assessment Terms of Reference #2, #3, #4, and #5 were not met. These particular sections are included in this report to document the analyses that were done for the peer review, but they are not recommended by SARC58 as a basis for management.] |
|---|