Monthly energetics of the Arctic Ocean are estimated based on results from six different coupled ice-ocean models. The components of the kinetic, potential and available potential energies, energy conversion and forcing rates are studied. The energy balances derived from the models differ significan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petteri Uotila A, David M. Holl, Miguel A. Morales Maqueda B, Sirpa Häkkinen C, Greg Holloway D, Michael Karcher F, Frank Kauker F, Michael Steele E, Nikolai Yakovlev G, Jinlun Zhang E, Andrey Proshutinsky H
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.593.9496
http://efdl.cims.nyu.edu/publications/refereed/ocean_modelling_aomip_05.pdf
Description
Summary:Monthly energetics of the Arctic Ocean are estimated based on results from six different coupled ice-ocean models. The components of the kinetic, potential and available potential energies, energy conversion and forcing rates are studied. The energy balances derived from the models differ significantly in the abyss, notably regarding the conversion of potential and kinetic energies. The models produce arctic boundary undercurrents controlled by the non-geostrophic components of the momentum equation, like advection and friction. Discrepancies exist where the modeled boundary currents are located and how completely the flow circulates around the Arctic Ocean. Two models produce cyclonic circulation, which is strongestAn energy-diagnostics intercomparison of coupled ice-ocean Arctic models