EVALUATION OF MINING WASTE ERODIBILITY, UNNAMED PROSPECT
We find this addendum partially complete, and require that a written response and map be submitted by July 1, 2011. Please call Carrie if you need an extension to this due date. Please respond to the following questions on the Archeological Survey (Exhibit P): 1. What information from the Archeologi...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.588.8004 http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/water_issues/programs/TMDLs/guadalupe_river_mercury/GRDC_3_Mines_Erosion_Addendum_July_2011.pdf |
| Summary: | We find this addendum partially complete, and require that a written response and map be submitted by July 1, 2011. Please call Carrie if you need an extension to this due date. Please respond to the following questions on the Archeological Survey (Exhibit P): 1. What information from the Archeological Survey should the Water Board keep confidential? Specifically, we propose to include the following pages as attachments to tentative orders posted on our website: both front and inside cover pages, pages i, 34 [Summary only], 37, and Map 4. 2. Summary p. 34: Where on Map 3 were the three additional locations to the south? 3. Summary p. 34: Where on “sketch map ” in Appendix C are the following indicated, “north additional mining shafts and tunnels might extended [sic] along the ridgeline and down the other side of the hill”? |
|---|