Published by Oxford University Press 2011. Inferred Paternity and Male Reproductive Success in a Killer Whale (Orcinus orca) Population

We used data from 78 individuals at 26 microsatellite loci to infer parental and sibling relationships within a community of fish-eating (‘‘resident’’) eastern North Pacific killer whales (Orcinus orca). Paternity analysis involving 15 mother/calf pairs and 8 potential fathers and whole-pedigree ana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael J. Ford, M. Bradley Hanson, Jennifer A. Hempelmann, Katherine L. Ayres, K. Emmons, Gregory S. Schorr, Robin W. Baird, Kenneth C. Balcomb, Samuel K. Wasser, M. Parsons, Kelly Balcomb-bartok
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.588.3533
http://www.cascadiaresearch.org/kws/Fordetal2011.pdf
Description
Summary:We used data from 78 individuals at 26 microsatellite loci to infer parental and sibling relationships within a community of fish-eating (‘‘resident’’) eastern North Pacific killer whales (Orcinus orca). Paternity analysis involving 15 mother/calf pairs and 8 potential fathers and whole-pedigree analysis of the entire sample produced consistent results. The variance in male reproductive success was greater than expected by chance and similar to that of other aquatic mammals. Although the number of confirmed paternities was small, reproductive success appeared to increase with male age and size. We found no evidence that males from outside this small population sired any of the sampled individuals. In contrast to previous results in a different population, many offspring were the result of matings within the same ‘‘pod’ ’ (long-term social group). Despite this pattern of breeding within social groups, we found no evidence of offspring produced by matings between close relatives, and the average internal relatedness of individuals was significantly less than expected if mating were random. The population’s estimated effective size was,30 or about 1/3 of the current census size. Patterns of allele frequency variation were consistent with a population bottleneck.