Real-time forecasting for the Antarctic: an evaluation of the Antarctic Mesoscale Prediction System (AMPS). Monthly Weather Review 133

In response to the need for improved weather prediction capabilities in support of the U.S. Antarctic Program’s field operations, the Antarctic Mesoscale Prediction System (AMPS) was implemented in Oc-tober 2000. AMPS employs the Polar MM5, a version of the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State Univer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David H. Bromwich, Andrew, J. Monaghan, Kevin W. Manning
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.586.4989
http://polarmet.osu.edu/PolarMet/PMGFulldocs/bromwich_monaghan_mwr_2005.pdf
Description
Summary:In response to the need for improved weather prediction capabilities in support of the U.S. Antarctic Program’s field operations, the Antarctic Mesoscale Prediction System (AMPS) was implemented in Oc-tober 2000. AMPS employs the Polar MM5, a version of the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University– NCAR Mesoscale Model optimized for use over ice sheets. The modeling system consists of several domains ranging in horizontal resolution from 90 km covering a large part of the Southern Hemisphere to 3.3 km over the complex terrain surrounding McMurdo, the hub of U.S. operations. The performance of the 30-km AMPS domain versus observations from manned and automatic weather stations is statistically evaluated for a 2-yr period from September 2001 through August 2003. The simulated 12–36-h surface pressure and near-surface temperature at most sites have correlations of r 0.95 and r 0.75, respectively, and small biases. Surface wind speeds reflect the complex topography and generally have correlations between 0.5 and 0.6, and positive biases of 1–2 m s1. In the free atmosphere, r 0.95 (geopotential height), r 0.9 (temperature), and r 0.8 (wind speed) at most sites. Over the annual cycle, there is little interseasonal variation in skill. Over the length of the forecast, a gradual decrease in skill is observed from hours 0–72. One exception is the surface pressure, which improves slightly in the first few hours, due in part