Surface Cyclolysis in the North Pacific Ocean. Part III: Composite Local Energetics of Tropospheric-Deep Cyclone Decay Associated with Rapid Surface Cyclolysis

Two regional local energetics composites of tropospheric-deep cyclone decay were constructed based upon 49 cyclones in the Gulf of Alaska region and 18 cyclones in the Bering Sea region whose decay was marked by rapid surface cyclolysis. Both composites indicate that surface drag is only a secondary...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin G. Mclay, Jonathan, E. Martin
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.496.7586
http://marrella.aos.wisc.edu/McLay_and_Martin2002.pdf
Description
Summary:Two regional local energetics composites of tropospheric-deep cyclone decay were constructed based upon 49 cyclones in the Gulf of Alaska region and 18 cyclones in the Bering Sea region whose decay was marked by rapid surface cyclolysis. Both composites indicate that surface drag is only a secondary sink of eddy kinetic energy (EKE) during the decay. This result holds even when a generous accounting is made for uncertainty in the surface drag calculation. The subordinate role of surface drag in the Gulf of Alaska region composite is particularly interesting, given that the cyclones in this composite decay in close proximity to rugged and extensive high-elevation terrain. Both composites also display two of the fundamental characteristics of the downstream development model of cyclone decay: the role of radiative dispersion as the chief sink of EKE during decay, and the occurrence of prominent downstream EKE dispersion. Furthermore, the two composites illustrate that an unusually pronounced decline in baroclinic conversion occurs simultaneously with the intense radiative dispersion. Taken together, these results suggest that the energetic decay of cyclones marked by rapid surface cyclolysis is driven from the upper troposphere, not from the surface. Some notable differences also emerge from the two composites. Considerable downstream development occurs in the immediate vicinity of the decaying cyclone in the Bering Sea region composite, but not in the