dehydration, and denitrification in Arctic cirrus”
I agree that the discussion paper provides not enough information on which observa-tions the model case study is based and how the model has been initialized. I will take care of these points in the revised manuscript. As mentioned in the discussion paper, I am referring to the measurements taken wi...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.452.4592 http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/S591/2005/acpd-5-S591-2005.pdf |
| Summary: | I agree that the discussion paper provides not enough information on which observa-tions the model case study is based and how the model has been initialized. I will take care of these points in the revised manuscript. As mentioned in the discussion paper, I am referring to the measurements taken with the GKSS Raman lidar near Kiruna, Sweden, published by Reichhardt et al. (2002), in particular their Figure 1b. As the observation is described there, and no further in situ information (e.g., from aircraft measurements) is available, I find it not necessary to repeat the lidar image in the discussion paper, but will describe the lidar backscatter image and the meteorological situation in more detail in the revised manuscript. |
|---|