authors’ reply

Reply to "Robust estimates of decline for pelagic shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico" Baum et al. (2005) challenge our assertion that their analyses of data sets used in their two papers (Baum et al. 2003; Baum and Myers 2004) are inadequate and do not capture t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George H. Burgess, Lawrence R. Beerkircher, Gregor M. Cailliet, John K. Carlson, Enric Cortés, Kenneth J. Goldman, R. Dean Grubbs, John A. Musick, Michael K. Musyl, Colin A. Simpfendorfer
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Myers
Northwest Atlantic
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.417.4769
http://imina.soest.hawaii.edu/PFRP/large_pelagics/Burgess_etal_05-Reply.pdf
Description
Summary:Reply to "Robust estimates of decline for pelagic shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico" Baum et al. (2005) challenge our assertion that their analyses of data sets used in their two papers (Baum et al. 2003; Baum and Myers 2004) are inadequate and do not capture the complete picture of all shark populations documented. They further hypothesize that their estimates are "robust " and their measured decline in shark abundance is therefore real, when in fact for many species, particularly pelagic sharks, their status is subject to further scientific analysis. The appropriate use of data sets and their subsequent analysis is an important issue. We agree

Similar Items