DOI 10.1007/s00265-011-1143-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Prior residency advantage for Atlantic salmon in the wild: effects of habitat quality

# The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Prior residency advantages have been explained by an asymmetry between the ‘owner ’ and the ‘intruder ’ in fighting ability (resource-holding potential) or motivation (value asymmetry (VA)). Here, we tested...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eli Kvingedal, Sigurd Einum, E. Kvingedal, S. Einum
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.291.2865
Description
Summary:# The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Prior residency advantages have been explained by an asymmetry between the ‘owner ’ and the ‘intruder ’ in fighting ability (resource-holding potential) or motivation (value asymmetry (VA)). Here, we tested for the extent of prior residence effects in individually tagged Atlantic salmon juveniles being released in two bouts (4 days apart) during spring along a natural stream, and recaptured 3 months later. A prior residency advantage was detected both in terms of body growth, energy density and male gonad size. As we controlled for effects of initial body size, which correlates with dominance, these findings are in accordance with the VA hypothesis. The growth advantage of first arrivals also increased with local shelter abundance in the stream, which can be expected if a higher resource value of the habitat results in a higher defence motivation. We also found a prior residence effect on spatial distribution, with the second arrivals within each release site being recaptured further downstream. No effect on apparent survival rates was found. The observed reduced growth and energy density may have fitness consequences for the second arrivals, both in terms of lower winter survival rates and later age at maturity. For mature male parr, both decreased body and gonad growth may give an additional disadvantage through reduced fertilization rates during