Journal of Applied Ecology doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01696.x Wolf survival and population trend using non-invasive capture–recapture techniques in the Western Alps

1. Reliable estimates of population parameters are often necessary for conservation management but these are hard to obtain for elusive, rare and wide-ranging species such as wolves Canis lupus. This species has naturally recolonized parts of its former habitat in Western Europe; however, an accurat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesca Marucco, Daniel H. Pletscher, Luigi Boitani, Michael K. Schwartz, Kristy L. Pilgrim, Jean-dominique Lebreton
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.190.2646
http://www.rmrs.nau.edu/publications/Marucco_et_al_2009/Marucco_et_al_2009.pdf
Description
Summary:1. Reliable estimates of population parameters are often necessary for conservation management but these are hard to obtain for elusive, rare and wide-ranging species such as wolves Canis lupus. This species has naturally recolonized parts of its former habitat in Western Europe; however, an accurate and cost-effective method to assess population trend and survival has not been implemented yet. 2. We used open-model capture–recapture (CR) sampling with non-invasive individual identifications derived from faecal genotyping to estimate survival and trend in abundance for wolves in the Western Alps between 1999 and 2006. Our sampling strategy reduced individual heterogeneity in recaptures, thus minimizing bias and increasing the precision of the estimates. 3. Young wolves had lower apparent annual survival rates (0Æ24 ± 0Æ06) than adult wolves (0Æ82 ± 0Æ04); survival rates were lower in the summer than in the winter for both young and adults. The wolf population in the study area increased from 21 ± 9Æ6 wolves in 1999 to 47 ± 11Æ2wolves in late winter 2005; the population growth rate (k =1Æ04 ± 0Æ27) was lower than that recorded for other recolonizing wolf populations. 4. We found a positive trend in wolf abundance, regardless of the method used. However, the abundance