1920 Fig. 3. Comparison of paleoclimatic
(blue line) and from MD 90-917 versus cal yr B.P. Chronology of the SST record is obtained by linear fits between two successive AMS 14 C ages on tephra (red arrows) and within peaks of abundance of planktonic foraminifera (black arrows) (9, 11). The 14 C ages were corrected from the varying measure...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.141.97 http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/~pel/environment/mpa.pdf |
| Summary: | (blue line) and from MD 90-917 versus cal yr B.P. Chronology of the SST record is obtained by linear fits between two successive AMS 14 C ages on tephra (red arrows) and within peaks of abundance of planktonic foraminifera (black arrows) (9, 11). The 14 C ages were corrected from the varying measured R surf (red line) (10) and using a constant R surf of 390 years (14) (green line), then converted to calendar ages (8). The use of the �520year R surf estimate at �8200 years (4), slightly older than the modern one during the sapropel event, permits a better correlation between the two records. δ 18 O (‰) |
|---|