Persistence and biodegradation of kerosene in high-arctic intertidal sediment

A kerosene type hydrocarbon fraction (equivalent to 7 L m 2) was added to enclosures in the surface layer of high-arctic intertidal beach sediment. The experimental spill was repeated in two consecutive years in the period July–September. The rate and extent of hydrocarbon removal and the accompanyi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stian Røberg, Svein Kristian Stormo, Bjarne Landfald
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.118.5101
http://www.nfh.uit.no/arctos/documents/papers/robergmer07.pdf
Description
Summary:A kerosene type hydrocarbon fraction (equivalent to 7 L m 2) was added to enclosures in the surface layer of high-arctic intertidal beach sediment. The experimental spill was repeated in two consecutive years in the period July–September. The rate and extent of hydrocarbon removal and the accompanying bacterial response were monitored for 79 days (2002) and 78 days (2003). The bulk of added kerosene, i.e. 94–98%, was lost from the upper 5 cm layer by putatively abiotic processes within 2 days and a residual fraction in the range 0.6–1.2 mg per g dry sediment was stably retained. Concomitant addition of oleophilic fertilizer led to higher initial retention, as 24 % of the kerosene remained after 2 days in the presence of a modified, cold-climate adapted version of the well-known Inipol EAP 22 bioremediation agent. In these enclosures, which showed an increase in hydrocarbon-degrader counts from 6.5 · 10 3 to 4.1 · 10 7 per g dry sediment within 8 days, a 17 % contribution by biodegradation to subsequent hydrocarbon removal was estimated. Stimulation in hydrocarbondegrader counts in fertilizer-alone control enclosures was indistinguishable from the stimulation observed with both kerosene and fertilizer present, suggesting that the dynamics in numbers of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria was primarily impacted by the bioremediation agent.