Estimating the biomitigation benefits of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture: A contingent behavior analysis

Keywords: Salmon farming Canada Environmental impacts Seafood demand analysis Random-effects negative binomial Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) Using the contingent behavior method, we estimate the benefits derived from the biomitigative effects of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R Martínez-Espiñeira, T Chopin, S Robinson, A Noce, D Knowler, W Yip
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1089.5192
http://www2.unb.ca/chopinlab/articles/files/Martinez-Espineira%20et%20al%202015%20CBA%20Aquaculture.pdf
Description
Summary:Keywords: Salmon farming Canada Environmental impacts Seafood demand analysis Random-effects negative binomial Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) Using the contingent behavior method, we estimate the benefits derived from the biomitigative effects of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) in the farming of Atlantic salmon. We asked a sample of Canadians how their farmed Atlantic salmon consumption choices would be affected by the availability of IMTA products in response to the decreased external costs they would impose on the surrounding marine environment. We used a random-effects negative binomial model to estimate their different demand functions and, from them, measures of increases in consumer surplus arising from the availability of IMTA products. We estimated a lower bound for the aggregate benefit that current salmon consumers in Canada would derive from the introduction of IMTA salmon of about CAD 280 million/year, while less restrictive assumptions about the representativeness of our sample would lead to an aggregate figure of about CAD 1.5 billion/year. We also found that consumers would benefit from proper labeling of farmed salmon, since conventionally farmed salmon and IMTA salmon are considered non-substitutes, the latter being a normal good and the former an inferior good for the typical consumer. We find that there is room for improving welfare by disseminating information to enhance consumer understanding of IMTA production techniques.