370 • REVIEWS

am not a historian but a librarian.” Authors should not be held to the fire for the excessive publicity of their publishers, but there should be some ac-countability for the assertion that Mr. Bryce was “the only one to have studied [the Cook papers] in detail and the only scholar with the right to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1031.6791
http://arctic.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/download/1152/1178/
Description
Summary:am not a historian but a librarian.” Authors should not be held to the fire for the excessive publicity of their publishers, but there should be some ac-countability for the assertion that Mr. Bryce was “the only one to have studied [the Cook papers] in detail and the only scholar with the right to publish excerpts. ” Not so, as at least two others and this reviewer have researched the same mate-rials and published from them. Yet what may be the most troubling for those interested in history is the subtitle, which asserts that this book has somehow “resolved ” the contro-versy (Bryce dismisses both Peary’s and Cook’s claims). The reader must decide this, but those about to embark on this thousand plus-page experience should know that any “reso-lution ” demands further reading and checking of authors and writers ignored or curtly dismissed in the reference notes.