Auroral ionospheric conductivities: a comparison between experiment and modeling, and theoretical f 10.7 -dependent model for EISCAT and
Abstract. Several authors have published models of aur-oral conductances in the past. Some of them are based on theoretical approaches; others are the result of observa-tions. The data bases for the latter models range from 8 h to 3 years of experiments. In this paper, we show the results of our own...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
1996
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1029.596 http://www.ann-geophys.net/14/1297/1996/angeo-14-1297-1996.pdf |
| Summary: | Abstract. Several authors have published models of aur-oral conductances in the past. Some of them are based on theoretical approaches; others are the result of observa-tions. The data bases for the latter models range from 8 h to 3 years of experiments. In this paper, we show the results of our own modeling, based on a coupled ki-netic/fluid approach. We compare these results to the sta-tistical model based on 3 years of experiment. We then model the auroral ionospheric conductances above EIS-CAT and the EISCAT-Svalbard Radar for different solar-activity indices. These modeled conductances are fitted with a simple law depending on the f 10.7 index and on the solar zenith angle. 1 |
|---|