二種類の『樺太土人旧慣調書』について

The policy for indigenous people promoted by the Government of Karafuto was different from the policy for Hokkaido Ainu, for the indigenous people in Sakhalin (Sakhalin Ainu, Uilta, Nivkh, etc) had no citizenship in Karafuto (southern Sakhalin) under the rule of Japanese Empire. According to laws, f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 田村, 将人, タムラ, マサト, TAMURA, Masato
Format: Report
Language:Japanese
Published: 千葉大学ユーラシア言語文化論講座 2008
Subjects:
サハリン先住民
樺太アイヌ
植民地
慣習法
NDC:389
Nivkh
Sakhalin
Uilta
Online Access:https://opac.ll.chiba-u.jp/da/curator/900080863/
https://opac.ll.chiba-u.jp/da/curator/900080863/2008no.10_143_169.pdf
Description
Summary:The policy for indigenous people promoted by the Government of Karafuto was different from the policy for Hokkaido Ainu, for the indigenous people in Sakhalin (Sakhalin Ainu, Uilta, Nivkh, etc) had no citizenship in Karafuto (southern Sakhalin) under the rule of Japanese Empire. According to laws, fundamentally civil and criminal cases were judged by the common law. Therefore the Government of Karafuto and the court investigated the common law of the indigenous people in Sakhalin and reported in the latter half of 1920's.

Similar Items