Methanogenic Community, CH4 Production Potential and Its Determinants in the Active Layer and Permafrost Deposits on the Tibetan Plateau
Permafrost thaw could increase methane (CH4) emissions, which largely depends on CH4 production driven by methanogenic archaea. However, large-scale evidence regarding key methanogenic taxa and their relative importance to abiotic factors in mediating methanogenesis remains limited. Here, we explore...
Published in: | Environmental Science & Technology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.ibcas.ac.cn/handle/2S10CLM1/26308 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07267 |
Summary: | Permafrost thaw could increase methane (CH4) emissions, which largely depends on CH4 production driven by methanogenic archaea. However, large-scale evidence regarding key methanogenic taxa and their relative importance to abiotic factors in mediating methanogenesis remains limited. Here, we explored the methanogenic community, potential CH4 production and its determinants in the active layer and permafrost deposits based on soil samples acquired from 12 swamp meadow sites along a , similar to 1000 km permafrost transect on the Tibetan Plateau. Our results revealed lower CH4 production potential, mcrA gene abundance, and richness in the permafrost layer than those in the active layer. CH4 production potential in both soil layers was regulated by microbial and abiotic factors. Of the microbial properties, marker OTUs, rather than the abundance and diversity of methanogens, stimulated CH4 production potential. Marker OTUs differed between the two soil layers with hydrogenotrophic Methanocellales and facultative acetoclastic Methanosarcina predominant in regulating CH4 production potential in the permafrost and active layer, respectively. Besides microbial drivers, CH4 production potential increased with the carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio in both soil layers and was also stimulated by soil moisture in the permafrost layer. These results provide empirical evidence for model improvements to better predict permafrost carbon feedback to climate warming. |
---|