The Characteristics and Variation of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Home Range

• Published in: Diversity
• Main Authors: Fielding, Alan H, Anderson, David, Barlow, Catherine, Benn, Stuart, Chandler, Charlotte, Reid, Robin, Tingay, Ruth, Weston, Ewan D, Whitfield, D. Philip
• Other Authors: Natural Research, Brathens; Dave Anderson Ecology, Callander; Southern Uplands Partnership, Galashiels; RSPB Scotland; University of Chester; Wild Justice, editor: Dimitrov, Dimitar
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI 2024
• Subjects: Raptor; Range use; Home range; Satellite tags; GPS-telemetry; Territory; Aquila chrysaetos; golden eagle
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10034/628987; https://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/628987/diversity-16-00523-v2.pdf?sequence=2; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090523

Satellite tracking allows for novel investigations into golden eagle home range characteristics. Understanding home range characteristics is important for conservation and for assessing the potential impact of landscape changes from forest planting, wind farms, etc. Small sample sizes, inconsistent definitions and methods restricted several previous studies. Our study involved 69 resident tagged eagles with over one year of data across five Scottish regions. Home range size was estimated from 95% isopleth contours extracted from Utilisation Distributions. Above a small threshold, estimated range size was not affected by the number of records but at least one year of data is required, largely because of the breeding and non-breeding seasonal differences. There were no significant range size differences between birds tagged as range holders and those previously tagged as nestlings. Across four regions, with considerable intra-regional variation, planar 95% isopleths did not differ (medians, km2): Argyll 58.9, Northwest Highlands 61.7, Northeast Highlands 89.3, South of Scotland 91.9. Ranges in the isolated Outer Hebrides region were exceptionally small, at 24.0 km2. Estimated range area was usually reduced to 70–80% of the planar area when restricted to usable habitat, as estimated by the Golden Eagle Topography (GET) model. Applying measures of known unsuitable habitat (closed-canopy commercial forest and wind turbines) further reduced usable open land. Loss of otherwise suitable habitat was substantially due to commercial forest. Larger ranges had larger extents of suitable habitat (according to GET), with no apparent optimum of preferred GET habitat. Range size was not different across a year between the sexes. Breeding ranges were smaller, and females’ breeding ranges were much smaller than those of males, but larger than males’ ranges in the non-breeding season. Breeding attempt duration was probably also influential. Our study provides novel insights into golden eagle home range characteristics and can guide ...