中國大陸一帶一路下的境外港口布局
碩士 國立政治大學 外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班 105922024 2013年，中國大陸提出「21世紀海上絲綢之路」並對外宣稱藉協助各國建設港口基礎設施，達到設施連通、貿易暢通，進而共同開發海洋資源。然審視中國大陸的海外港口投資發展迄今，雖然不似珍珠鏈戰略所說將港口挪作軍事用途，卻可以發現中國是依著海上通道咽喉點來選擇投資港口，以貿易角度而言，這些港口的貨櫃吞吐量並非名列前茅，天然條件亦非最佳，卻都是地理戰略位置非常重要的節點。中國為了降低其他國家對其疑慮，透過海上反恐合作、護航任務，提高國際形象，換個角度想中國已經具有藍水海軍的能力，海權實力不容小覷。\n中國大陸推行一帶一路倡議到全...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/120305 https://doi.org/10.6814/THE.NCCU.DIPSIS.010.2018.F09 https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/120305/1/202401.pdf |
| Summary: | 碩士 國立政治大學 外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班 105922024 2013年，中國大陸提出「21世紀海上絲綢之路」並對外宣稱藉協助各國建設港口基礎設施，達到設施連通、貿易暢通，進而共同開發海洋資源。然審視中國大陸的海外港口投資發展迄今，雖然不似珍珠鏈戰略所說將港口挪作軍事用途，卻可以發現中國是依著海上通道咽喉點來選擇投資港口，以貿易角度而言，這些港口的貨櫃吞吐量並非名列前茅，天然條件亦非最佳，卻都是地理戰略位置非常重要的節點。中國為了降低其他國家對其疑慮，透過海上反恐合作、護航任務，提高國際形象，換個角度想中國已經具有藍水海軍的能力，海權實力不容小覷。\n中國大陸推行一帶一路倡議到全球，亞太、南亞國家囿於鄰近中國，政軍實力不強，因此多傾向支持帶路倡議，印度有感地緣上遭受侵犯，因此強烈反對一帶一路，海灣國家與非洲國家普遍內部政局不穩、基礎建設落後又長期與中國交好，所以歡迎帶路倡議，歐盟國家的主旋律雖拒絕一帶一路，然近年內部問題叢生，經濟下滑，各國私底下歡迎中國前來投資，美國因新政府雖拒絕帶路政策，然退出TPP削弱了在亞洲的影響力，而日本成了中國大陸港口布局的阻力，從東南亞到南亞都可以看見日本競爭港口投資的身影。 China proposed “the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road” in 2013, claiming that China will help countries build ports, so as to realize onfrastructure connectivity and unimpeded trade. Judging from China’s investment in overseas ports, China did not adopt the “String of Pearls. Strategy” and militarize the ports it invested in. However, it can be found that those ports are along the chockpoints of the maritime routes. Although the ports neither give outstanding throughput performance nor enjoy superb natural conditions in terms of trade, their position are great geopolitical and strategic importance. In order to ease concern around the world, China is improving its global image through maritime counterrorism cooperation and escort missions. However, such moves also that its Navy has acquired blue water capabilities, so China’s maritime strength should not be underestimated.\nChina sells its BRI to the world. Most of the Asia-Pacific and South Asian countries, which are geographically close to China and weak in political, economic, and military strengths, tend to support the initiative. India, feeling geopolitically threatened, strongly oppose it. Most Gulf and African countries suffer from polical instability and poor infrastructure, but they also welcome the initiative thank to their long-time close delations with China. EU member states, in general, reject the initiative, but they still welcome Chinese investment in private due to problems within the EU and gloomy economy. As for US, those the ... |
|---|