Do Canadian power-sharing agreements with first nations peoples hold lessons for Taiwan?
On 23 September 2010, the government of Taiwan moved closer to establishing a legislative framework for the negotiation of power sharing agreements with the nation's aboriginal groups when the Cabinet decided to approve the Indigenous Peoples Self-Government Act. Although the Act still awaits p...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/76033 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/76033/1/93-121.pdf |
| Summary: | On 23 September 2010, the government of Taiwan moved closer to establishing a legislative framework for the negotiation of power sharing agreements with the nation's aboriginal groups when the Cabinet decided to approve the Indigenous Peoples Self-Government Act. Although the Act still awaits passage by the Legislature, many stakeholders in aboriginal self-rule are optimistic about this latest move. Others say the legislation lacks teeth. In many of its policy initiatives, the ROC government has looked abroad for a blueprint, and Canada is the Western country that is often promoted as a viable model to follow in this regard. The purpose of this paper is to contrast the historical and cultural influences of each nation's relationship with its indigenous population and, given these variances, identify potential roadblocks to Taiwan's successful implementation of a viable mechanism for deriving aboriginal self-government agreements based on the Canadian example, as well as to propose policy recommendations on what direction relevant legislation should take. |
|---|