Risk-benefit considerations in evaluating commensal anticoagulant rodenticide impacts to wildlife

Evaluation of the possible impacts of rodenticides on wildlife must be conducted in the context of risk-benefit considerations. Harmful introduced pests (e.g., commensal rats and mice) historically have required management around human habitation for economic and public health reasons. Disparate vie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference
Main Authors: Kaukeinen, D. E., Spragins, C. W., Hobson, J. F.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: eScholarship, University of California 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7w63h1wp
Description
Summary:Evaluation of the possible impacts of rodenticides on wildlife must be conducted in the context of risk-benefit considerations. Harmful introduced pests (e.g., commensal rats and mice) historically have required management around human habitation for economic and public health reasons. Disparate views of limited data have accumulated concerning the wildlife impacts resulting from commensal rodent control activities. The founding of the Rodenticide Registrants Task Force (RRTF), a trade association that includes all the major manufacturers and importers of anticoagulant rodenticide products (and bromethalin, a non-anticoagulant rodenticide) in the U.S., is described. The potential for anticoagulant dispersion in wildlife via primary and secondary routes is considered. Toxicology and pharmacokinetic studies are analyzed to obtain a better understanding of the biological and toxicological significance of low levels of rodenticide in animal tissue. A framework to address rodenticide impact to wildlife is presented. It is based upon the example of long-term cooperative efforts in England involving government, environmental, and manufacturer groups.