On the HCN and CO 2 abundance and distribution in Jupiter's stratosphere
International audience Observations of Jupiter by Cassini/CIRS, acquired during the December 2000 flyby, provide the latitudinal distribution of HCN and CO 2 in Jupiter's stratosphere with unprecedented spatial resolution and coverage. Following up on a preliminary study by Kunde et al. [Kunde,...
Published in: | Icarus |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hal.science/hal-03742224 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2006.05.018 |
Summary: | International audience Observations of Jupiter by Cassini/CIRS, acquired during the December 2000 flyby, provide the latitudinal distribution of HCN and CO 2 in Jupiter's stratosphere with unprecedented spatial resolution and coverage. Following up on a preliminary study by Kunde et al. [Kunde, V.G., and 41 colleagues, 2004. Science 305, 1582-1587], the analysis of these observations leads to two unexpected results (i) the total HCN mass in Jupiter's stratosphere in 2000 was (6.0±1.5)×10 g, i.e., at least three times larger than measured immediately after the Shoemaker-Levy 9 (SL9) impacts in July 1994 and (ii) the latitudinal distributions of HCN and CO 2 are strikingly different: while HCN exhibits a maximum at 45° S and a sharp decrease towards high Southern latitudes, the CO 2 column densities peak over the South Pole. The total CO 2 mass is (2.9±1.2)×10 g. A possible cause for the HCN mass increase is its production from the photolysis of NH 3 , although a problem remains because, while millimeter-wave observations clearly indicate that HCN is currently restricted to submillibar ( ˜0.3 mbar) levels, immediate post-impact infrared observations have suggested that most of the ammonia was present in the lower stratosphere near 20 mbar. HCN appears to be a good atmospheric tracer, with negligible chemical losses. Based on 1-dimensional (latitude) transport models, the HCN distribution is best interpreted as resulting from the combination of a sharp decrease (over an order of magnitude in K) of wave-induced eddy mixing poleward of 40° and an equatorward transport with ˜7 cms velocity. The CO 2 distribution was investigated by coupling the transport model with an elementary chemical model, in which CO 2 is produced from the conversion of water originating either from SL9 or from auroral input. The auroral source does not appear adequate to reproduce the CO 2 peak over the South Pole, as required fluxes are unrealistically high and the shape of the CO 2 bulge is not properly matched. In contrast, the CO 2 ... |
---|