The impact of deep convection representation in a global atmospheric model on the warm conveyor belt and jet stream during NAWDEX IOP6

• Main Authors: Rivière, Gwendal, Wimmer, Meryl, Arbogast, Philippe, Piriou, Jean-Marcel, Delanoë, Julien, Labadie, Carole, Cazenave, Quitterie, Pelon, Jacques
• Other Authors: Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (UMR 8539) (LMD), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-École polytechnique (X)-École des Ponts ParisTech (ENPC)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Département des Géosciences - ENS Paris, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)
• Format: Report
• Language: English
• Published: HAL CCSD 2021
• Subjects: [SDU.OCEAN]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Ocean; Atmosphere; [SDU.STU.ME]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Meteorology; North Atlantic
• Online Access: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03401330; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03401330/document; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03401330/file/Paper_WCB_upper_jet_stream.pdf; https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2021-38

Abstract. The effect of parameterized deep convection on warm conveyor belt (WCB) activity and jet stream is investigated by performing simulations of an explosively-developing large-scale cyclone that occurred during the North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment (NAWDEX) field campaign using the Météo-France global atmospheric model ARPEGE. Three simulations differing only from their deep convection representation are analysed. The first one was performed with the Bougeault et al. (1985) scheme (B85), the second one with the Prognostic Condensates Microphysics and Transport (PCMT) scheme of Piriou et al. (2007), and the third one without any parameterized deep convection. In the latter simulation, the release of convective instability at the resolved scales of the model generates localized cells marked by strong heating with few degrees extent in longitude and latitude along the fronts. In runs with active parameterized deep convection (B85, PCMT), the heating rate is more homogeneously distributed along fronts as the instability release happens at sub-grid scales. This difference leads to more rapid and abrupt ascents in the WCB without parameterized deep convection, and more moderate but more sustained ascents with parameterized deep convection. While the number of WCB trajectories does not differ much between the three simulations, the averaged heating rates over the WCB trajectories exhibits distinct behavior. After one day of simulations, the upper-level heating rate is in average larger with B85 scheme leading to stronger potential vorticity (PV) destruction. The difference comes from the large-scale heating and not the parameterized heating.A comparison with (re)analyses and a large variety of airborne observations from the NAWDEX field campaign (Doppler radar, Doppler lidar, dropsondes) made during the coordinated flights of two aircraft in the WCB outflow region shows that B85 performs better in the representation of the double jet structure at 1-day lead time than the other two ...