Environmental controls on CH4 emission from polygonal tundra on the micro-site scale in the Lena River Delta, Siberia
International audience The carbon budgets of the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems are closely coupled by vertical gas exchange fluxes. Uncertainties remain with respect to high latitude ecosystems and the processes driving their temporally and spatially highly variable methane exchange. Problem...
Published in: | Global Change Biology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00552619 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00552619/document https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00552619/file/PEER_stage2_10.1111%252Fj.1365-2486.2010.02232.x.pdf https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02232.x |
Summary: | International audience The carbon budgets of the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems are closely coupled by vertical gas exchange fluxes. Uncertainties remain with respect to high latitude ecosystems and the processes driving their temporally and spatially highly variable methane exchange. Problems associated with scaling plot measurements to larger areas in heterogeneous environments are addressed based on intensive field studies on two nested spatial scales in Northern Siberia. Methane fluxes on the micro-site scale (0.1–100 m2) were measured in the Lena River Delta from July through September 2006 by closed chambers and were compared to simultaneous ecosystem scale (104 m2–106 m2) flux measurements by the eddy covariance method. Closed chamber measurements were conducted almost daily on 15 plots in four differently developed polygon centers and on a polygon rim. Controls on methane emission were identified by stepwise multiple regression. In contrast to relatively low ecosystem-scale fluxes controlled mainly by near-surface turbulence, fluxes on the micro-site scale were almost an order of magnitude higher at the wet polygon centers and near zero at the drier polygon rim and high-center polygon. Micro-site scale methane fluxes varied strongly even within the same micro-sites. The only statistically significant control on chamber-based fluxes was surface temperature calculated using the Stefan-Boltzmann equation in the wet polygon centers, while no significant control was found for the low emissions from the dry sites. The comparison with the eddy covariance measurements reveals differences in controls and the seasonal dynamics between the two measurement scales, which may have consequences for scaling and process-based models. Despite those differences, closed-chamber measurements from within the eddy covariance footprint could be scaled by an area-weighting approach of landcover classes based on high-resolution imagery to match the total ecosystem-scale emission. Our nested sampling design allowed for ... |
---|