Clumped Isotopes Link Older Carbon Substrates With Slower Rates of Methanogenesis in Northern Lakes

The release of long‐stored carbon from thawed permafrost could fuel increased methanogenesis in northern lakes, but it remains unclear whether old carbon substrates released from permafrost are metabolized as rapidly by methanogenic microbial communities as recently produced organic carbon. Here, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Douglas, Peter M. J., Moguel, Regina Gonzalez, Anthony, Katey M. Walter, Wik, Martin, Crill, Patrick M., Dawson, Katherine S., Smith, Derek A., Yanay, Ella, Lloyd, Max K., Stolper, Daniel A., Eiler, John M., Sessions, Alex L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: American Geophysical Union 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://authors.library.caltech.edu/102400/
https://authors.library.caltech.edu/102400/1/2019GL086756.pdf
https://authors.library.caltech.edu/102400/2/grl60364-sup-0001-2019gl086756-si.pdf
https://authors.library.caltech.edu/102400/3/grl60364-sup-0002-2019gl086756-ts01.pdf
https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20200408-093725679
Description
Summary:The release of long‐stored carbon from thawed permafrost could fuel increased methanogenesis in northern lakes, but it remains unclear whether old carbon substrates released from permafrost are metabolized as rapidly by methanogenic microbial communities as recently produced organic carbon. Here, we apply methane (CH₄) clumped isotope (Δ₁₈) and ¹⁴C measurements to test whether rates of methanogenesis are related to carbon substrate age. Results from culture experiments indicate that Δ₁₈ values are negatively correlated with CH₄ production rate. Measurements of ebullition samples from thermokarst lakes in Alaska and glacial lakes in Sweden indicate strong negative correlations between CH₄ Δ₁₈ and the fraction modern carbon. These correlations imply that CH₄ derived from older carbon substrates is produced relatively slowly. Relative rates of methanogenesis, as inferred from Δ₁₈ values, are not positively correlated with CH₄ flux estimates, highlighting the likely importance of environmental variables other than CH₄ production rates in controlling ebullition fluxes.