Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases

This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques
Main Authors: Eerola, Aleksi, Reuchamps, Min
Language:French
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Iceland
Online Access:https://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319
https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.077.0319
id ftcairn:oai:cairn.info:RIEJ_077_0319
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcairn:oai:cairn.info:RIEJ_077_0319 2023-05-15T16:46:48+02:00 Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases Eerola, Aleksi Reuchamps, Min 43 2016 https://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319 https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.077.0319 fre fre https://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319 doi:10.3917/riej.077.0319 Cairn Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques, Volume 77, 2, 2016-12-19, pp.319-336 2016 ftcairn https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.077.0319 2021-02-03T03:25:00Z This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy. Other/Unknown Material Iceland Cairn (E-Journals) Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques 77 2 319
institution Open Polar
collection Cairn (E-Journals)
op_collection_id ftcairn
language French
description This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.
author Eerola, Aleksi
Reuchamps, Min
spellingShingle Eerola, Aleksi
Reuchamps, Min
Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases
author_facet Eerola, Aleksi
Reuchamps, Min
author_sort Eerola, Aleksi
title Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases
title_short Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases
title_full Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases
title_fullStr Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases
title_sort constitutional modernisation and deliberative democracy: a political science assessment of four cases
publishDate 2016
url https://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319
https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.077.0319
op_coverage 43
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques, Volume 77, 2, 2016-12-19, pp.319-336
op_relation https://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319
doi:10.3917/riej.077.0319
op_rights Cairn
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.077.0319
container_title Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques
container_volume 77
container_issue 2
container_start_page 319
_version_ 1766036905572433920

Similar Items