Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases
This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.
| Published in: | Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Language: | French |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIEJ_077_0319 https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.077.0319 |
| Summary: | This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy. |
|---|