Density Estimation in a Wolverine Population using Spatial Capture-Recapture Models

Classical closed-population capture—recapture models do not accommodate the spatial information inherent in encounter history data obtained from camera-trapping studies. As a result, individual heterogeneity in encounter probability is induced, and it is not possible to estimate density objectively...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Main Authors: J. Andrew Royle, Audrey J. Magoun, Beth Gardner, Patrick Valkenburg, Richard E. Lowell
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: The Wildlife Society 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.79
Description
Summary:Classical closed-population capture—recapture models do not accommodate the spatial information inherent in encounter history data obtained from camera-trapping studies. As a result, individual heterogeneity in encounter probability is induced, and it is not possible to estimate density objectively because trap arrays do not have a well-defined sample area. We applied newly-developed, capture—recapture models that accommodate the spatial attribute inherent in capture—recapture data to a population of wolverines (Gulo gulo) in Southeast Alaska in 2008. We used camera-trapping data collected from 37 cameras in a 2,140-km2 area of forested and open habitats largely enclosed by ocean and glacial icefields. We detected 21 unique individuals 115 times. Wolverines exhibited a strong positive trap response, with an increased tendency to revisit previously visited traps. Under the trap-response model, we estimated wolverine density at 9.7 individuals/1,000 km2 (95% Bayesian CI: 5.9–15.0). Our model provides a formal statistical framework for estimating density from wolverine camera-trapping studies that accounts for a behavioral response due to baited traps. Further, our model-based estimator does not have strict requirements about the spatial configuration of traps or length of trapping sessions, providing considerable operational flexibility in the development of field studies.