Publisher Correction: Projected poleward migration of the Southern Ocean CO2 sink region under high emissions

Correction to: Communications Earth & Environmenthttps://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01382-y, published online 02 May 2024 The original version of this article omitted one of the affiliations of the corresponding author “Precious Mongwe”. The missing affiliation “National Institute for Theoretica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communications Earth & Environment
Main Authors: Mongwe, Precious, Gregor, Luke, Tjiputra, Jerry, Hauck, Judith, Ito, Takamitsu, Danek, Christopher, Vichi, Marcello, Thomalla, Sandy, Monteiro, Pedro MS
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Springer Nature 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/58885/
https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/58885/1/Mongwe%20et%20al.%20-%202024%20-%20Publisher%20Correction%20Projected%20poleward%20migration.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01475-8
https://hdl.handle.net/10013/epic.a0a38029-e20d-453c-9fbc-9327c3be7d49
Description
Summary:Correction to: Communications Earth & Environmenthttps://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01382-y, published online 02 May 2024 The original version of this article omitted one of the affiliations of the corresponding author “Precious Mongwe”. The missing affiliation “National Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences (Nitec), Cape Town, South Africa” has been added. In the original version of this article, several reference numbers were incorrect. Specifically: In the section “Results”, subsection “Mechanisms of air-sea CO2 fluxes in the present climate”, third paragraph, references in the sentence starting “Some studies have linked this temperature bias to discrepancies”, were incorrectly given as “40,41”, whereas “40” is correct. In the section “Discussion”, second paragraph, references in the sentence starting “Relatively low model skill” were incorrectly given as “35, 47–49” following “biases in sea ice” whereas “36, 47–49” is correct; as “38,40” following “impact on heat fluxes”, whereas “38,40” is correct; and as “37,50” following “the AMOC”, whereas “37” is correct. In the section “Discussion”, last paragraph, the reference in the sentence starting “On the other hand, anthropogenic ice sheet melt in Antarctica” was incorrectly given as “41”, whereas “58” is correct. In the following sentence, starting “Moreover, ice sheet melt”, references were incorrectly given as “38,41”, whereas “58,59” is correct. In the section “Methods”, subsection “Earth System Models”, first sentence, the reference following “climate scenario” was incorrectly given as “59”, whereas “60” is correct. In the section “Methods”, subsection “Observation-based pCO2 -products”, first sentence, the reference following “Sea-Flux dataset” was incorrectly given as “60”, whereas “61” is correct; in the following sentence, references were incorrectly given as “61” following “CMEMS-LSCE-FFNN”, whereas “62” is correct; as “63” following “CSIR-ML6”, whereas “63” is correct; as “63” following “Jena-MLS”, whereas “64” is correct; as “64” ...